

Is it worth a watch??

The most serious subject presented using a very unimpressive, totally fictional, irrevalent story with very bad acting. The story could have been made good as the Kolkata and Noyakhali killings were real and lot of innocent people based on their religion (both Hindus and Muslims) were killed in 1946/47 before the independence. The Bengal Files is presented it in a very inflammatory and one-sided way and didn't do proper justice to history and to the real people who suffered.

Mullah atrocities.

An intense and thought-provoking film that sheds light on a difficult chapter of our history. It was unsettling to watch at times, but it helped to understand a part of the past that I wasn’t fully aware of.

f propganda movie by f chaddi gang

The horrific truth. Islam is a septic tank and Muhammad was a pos who lived a disgusting life and died miserably from rat poison. Allah didn't care. lol Gandhi was the worst joker eunuch who never did anything good for Hindus or India. He was a loser and feet licker of the stinking pigs of the death cult religion. Hats off to Vivek for bringing out the truth and reminding the current generation what atrocities happened less than 100 years ago in our great country. Jai Hind.

It's an incredible movie with a mamoth efforts. Even Bengalis don't know the real history. It's a 3 hour long horror show of sheer terrorized and agonized Hindus for centuries. The extreme of which is such that it cannot be shown through the movie. Schindler's list, boy's in the striped pajama and now the Bengal files to be remembered in the history as a movie that would move your heart from the deeply sensitive and sad events of history such as systematic Hindu Genocide.

All those "intellectuals" trying to save Hindutva: buy a one-way ticket, go back, and live as slaves to the RSS fake fabricated stories. Note : Hindutva is not Hinduism,.. Hindutva is a toxic political ideology that spreads lies.

Reading too many historic books can sometimes feel like a waste of time when we pull events from eras of swords and wars into today’s generation without context. Bringing such old events directly into modern life is anachronistic and can create unnecessary confusion. It may even distract us from the real fabric of India—its diversity, humanity, and compassion. Sarve bhavantu sukhinah is the spirit we should uphold.

Today is an era of knowledge, peace, democracy, and constitutional values, whereas those earlier times were marked by war, weapons, revenge, bloodshed, and kingdoms. History is important to learn from, but not to recreate in modern society.

As a Muslim, i condemned all the voilance people did and doing on the name of Islam. Islam never teaches killing inocent people. Even it is a war rule that if enemy leave his weapon and slander, do not kill them. It is not allowed to kill woman, children and elderly even in the war. Rape of a woman is not allowed in any condition. At the day of judgement I will be the witness against those so called Muslims who killed inocent people and raped women. It is so sad.

Manusmriti : 1. Explicitly says Shudras must serve the three upper three varnas without reward (8.417, 10.129). 2. Says a Shudra who insults a twice-born man can have his tongue cut out; a man who teaches a Shudra the Vedas can have boiling oil poured in his mouth and ears (8.270–272). 3. Declares that even if a Shudra becomes rich, he must still serve Brahmins (10.129).

Manusmriti (Misogyny and extreme patriarchy) : Famous verse: “Her father protects her in childhood, her husband protects her in youth, and her sons protect her in old age; a woman is never fit for independence” (9.3). A woman who is unfaithful must be torn apart by dogs (8.371). Widows are forbidden to remarry and must live an ascetic life (5.157–161), while widowers can remarry immediately.

Manusmriti : (Punishments based on caste) : The same crime gets vastly different punishments depending on caste. Example: If a Shudra kills a Brahmin → death If a Brahmin kills a Shudra → fine of only 1 pana (like killing a cat or frog has higher fine).

Manusmriti : (Endorsement of child marriage ) Recommends that a man marry a girl who is one-third his age (9.94) and before she reaches puberty.

Manusmriti (Untouchability (early justification)) Though full untouchability developed later, Manusmriti already calls certain castes “impure” and forbids Brahmins from even looking at them during certain rituals (3.239–240).

Manusmriti (Slavery) Permits and regulates slavery; says certain castes are born to be slaves (8.414). All these as per grok. https://grok.com/c/f64d0c22-6342-4839-81e3-b13193271c42

great movie

what an eye opener. Surprising that Direct action day and the massacre of Bengal has been wiped out of our syllabus and we learnt abt mughals and not the real atrocities faced by Indian Hindus during that time. Gandhi and Nehru once again are proven to be not the father and Chacha of nation. THis movie definitely raises the question from us Indians and Hindus who we are and what have we become

how harsh history of bengal was.....I am still not able to see the true Indians...only religion, caste.....Oh God...please fill my fellow humans with humanity...remove this religion,caste...barriers...make them humans....make them peaceful.....remove hatred....fill the love..

One of the best movie of the centuries

Wonderful make. True to the deepest. Presented to the extreme level. Good to make the world aware of unknown facts about country.

Such a good and important topic... made so irresponsibly.. characters are so badly written so are dialogs...bad music.. should have focused on Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy and his role...more deeply.. what a waste ...

The past and the present are well connected but the movie could have been 1 hr shorter, by reducing various details.